About Me

Name: theoilpatchplug
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

$92.$93.$94.$95, They Should Worry About Keeping Warm, Not Global Warming

Fearing Fuel

By INVESTOR'S BUSINESS DAILY | Posted Friday, October 26, 2007 4:20 PM PT

Energy: With oil reaching an all-time high of $92 a barrel, it's long past time for more investment in domestic production. Yet the Democratic Congress is keen on reducing investment with new taxes on oil companies.


Democrats Seek Control, Not Wealth for the Rest of Us


The House of Representatives approved a bill that rescinds tax incentives for oil and gas companies, increasing taxes on the industry by $15 billion.

The Senate Finance Committee one-upped that measure with a package that sticks it to energy companies to the tune of $31 billion in more taxes.

Senate Republicans have prevented that measure from being attached to the Senate's energy bill, and some Republicans have been blocking Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid from bringing the measure to a House-Senate conference to iron out differences.

In sum, Republicans are trying to stop Democrats from further reducing America's production of its own fuel, placing us even more at the mercy of Middle East Arab states and oil-rich thugs like Venezuela's Hugo Chavez.

They're also trying to stop Democrats from doing something that would raise gasoline prices at the pump to an even higher level than they are now.

The 8% rise in the price of oil seen in the latter half of last week — up $7 to reach a record $92 — came in the wake of new U.S. sanctions on Iran and a rebel attack on an oil vessel off the coast of Nigeria.

Why should the supply and cost of the U.S. economy's most valuable commodity be dependent on geopolitics in some of the most unstable regions of the world? Boosting our domestic supply is the key to lessening that dangerous dependence.

Senate Minority Whip Trent Lott, R-Miss., and others in the Senate GOP leadership would prefer a House-Senate conference to take place so that Democrats don't succeed in bulldozing Republicans on an energy bill.

But just like Sens. John Cornyn of Texas, Jim DeMint of South Carolina and the others opposing a conference, Lott was all fighting words.

"I don't know what they've worked out or who they've worked it out with, but if it's anything close to what we had in the Senate bill, it will not happen," Lott promised, as quoted in Congress Daily. "We will filibuster it and/or the president will veto it, and we will sustain the veto."

Lott called the Senate Democrats' plans "a total waste of time," adding: "If they think they can just ram us, they can't."

It's encouraging to see Republicans fight for something worth fighting for. It isn't "Big Oil" they're defending here; it's the U.S. economy and national security.

Consider the certain effects of the Democrats' plans:

• Going after the five biggest oil and gas companies in America would directly reduce the record levels of investment they've been making in finding, extracting, refining and delivering new domestic sources of oil — for instance, Chevron plans to spend $500 million to boost gasoline output by 10%, or 600,000 gallons a day, at its huge Mississippi refinery by 2010. Mobil Oil recently estimated that it had spent $279 billion on capital spending and exploration since 1985 — an amount exceeding its profit of $267 billion. Guess what will get cut if profits shrink?

• If implemented, the Democrats' plans would actually let the many foreign oil companies with U.S. production pay a lower tax rate on U.S. income than American companies.

• Both the Senate and House plans would change the nearly decade-old lease contracts for Outer Continental Shelf energy production by imposing taxes and fees after the energy industry has invested billions in the projects.

The oil and gas sector is one of the most capital-intensive parts of the U.S. economy. Companies use profits to invest staggering amounts in new technologies to extract oil from places where it was impossible just a few years ago — without harming the environment.

When will Democrats stop fearing the domestically produced fuel that will save consumers money and make our country safer?

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Hillary, the Ugly Eloi

Human race will 'split into two different species'

 

The human race will one day split into two separate species, an attractive, intelligent ruling elite and an underclass of dim-witted, ugly goblin-like creatures, according to a top scientist.

100,000 years into the future, sexual selection could mean that two distinct breeds of human will have developed.

The alarming prediction comes from evolutionary theorist Oliver Curry from the London School of Economics, who says that the human race will have reached its physical peak by the year 3000.

Scroll down for more...

humans

The report claims that after they reach their peak around the year 3000 humans will begin to regress

Enlarge the image

These humans will be between 6ft and 7ft tall and they will live up to 120 years.

"Physical features will be driven by indicators of health, youth and fertility that men and women have evolved to look for in potential mates," says the report, which suggests that advances in cosmetic surgery and other body modifying techniques will effectively homogenise our appearance.

Men will have symmetrical facial features, deeper voices and bigger penises, according to Curry in a report commissioned for men's satellite TV channel Bravo.

Women will all have glossy hair, smooth hairless skin, large eyes and pert breasts, according to Curry.

Racial differences will be a thing of the past as interbreeding produces a single coffee-coloured skin tone.

The future for our descendants isn't all long life, perfect bodies and chiselled features, however.

While humans will reach their peak in 1000 years' time, 10,000 years later our reliance on technology will have begun to dramatically change our appearance.

Medicine will weaken our immune system and we will begin to appear more child-like.

Dr Curry said: "The report suggests that the future of man will be a story of the good, the bad and the ugly.

Scroll down for more...

H G Wells' Science Fiction novel The Time Machine (which was later adapted into two films - this picture is from the 2002 version) the human race has evolved into two species, the highly intelligent and wealthy Eloi...

...and the frightening, animalistic Morlock (as seen in the 1960 film version of the classic book)

"While science and technology have the potential to create an ideal habitat for humanity over the next millennium, there is the possibility of a monumental genetic hangover over the subsequent millennia due to an over-reliance on technology reducing our natural capacity to resist disease, or our evolved ability to get along with each other.

"After that, things could get ugly, with the possible emergence of genetic 'haves' and 'have-nots'."

Dr Curry's theory may strike a chord with readers who have read H G Wells' classic novel The Time Machine, in particular his descriptions of the Eloi and the Morlock races.

In the 1895 book, the human race has evolved into two distinct species, the highly intelligent and wealthy Eloi and the frightening, animalistic Morlock who are destined to work underground to keep the Eloi happy. 

By NIALL FIRTH - Last updated at 16:18pm on 26th October 2007

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Modern Art.. Modern Media

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

"Remember, Only You Can Prevent Forest Liars"

Cartoons By Michael Ramirez
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Death, Taxes, Rangel, Death Again

Charlie The Job Killer

 

Taxes: Charles Rangel, chief of the House Ways and Means Committee, wants to pass the largest income-tax hike ever, to punish the rich. That the middle class and poor would lose millions of jobs goes unmentioned.


Charlie's Floating a Trial Balloon for Hill


'We are not raising taxes" the Democrat from Harlem insisted as he unveiled a plan seeking $1 trillion in new federal revenues in a decade. It includes:

• A 4% income tax surcharge on adjusted gross income over $200,000 for married couples, rising to 4.6% on incomes above $500,000 — which will hit as the Bush tax cuts expire.

• An increase in the capital gains tax rate to 19.6% from 15% for households pulling in over $200,000.

• A more-than-doubling of the tax on private equity firms' carried interest, from the capital gains rate of 15% up to 37.9% — heavily penalizing one of the most effective ways for businesses to restructure themselves and generate jobs.

• $9.4 billion more in Social Security and Medicare taxes for those who file via partnership.

• $4.3 billion in new taxes by requiring the reporting of stock purchase prices to the Internal Revenue Service.

• $20.7 billion in new taxes on mergers and acquisitions via amortization rules changes.

The crafty veteran Harlem lawmaker says it's all worth it to shield the middle class from the ever-expanding Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT) — plus, he's throwing in a cut in the corporate tax. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi has stated she supports the plan.

It would be tempting to accuse Rangel of waging a "Class War" on the rich, but the class who would really get hurt here is the working class, those who are employed by the people Rangel would hurt.

As House Ways and Means ranking Republican Jim McCrery of Louisiana noted, Rangel's plan would be a $3.5 trillion tax increase over 10 years, pushing the top income tax rate to 44%, sixth-highest among industrialized nations and far above the global average of 35.7%.

McCrery says the surtax on AGI will erode the mortgage interest deduction, along with tax breaks on charitable giving, state and local taxes, plus impose a heavy marriage penalty. Most of the 90 million Americans Rangel claims to be benefiting will, according to McCrery, be getting "a purely imaginary 'tax cut.' "

What a time to soak the rich.

Rep. Jim Saxton of New Jersey, ranking Republican on the Joint Economic Committee, reported this month that the top one percent of tax filers now pay more than 39% of all federal income taxes, while the richest 5% pay 60%, and the wealthiest half of taxpayers pay 97%, according to the IRS, all new records.

Revenues are breaking records, too — up by $785 billion since the Bush tax cuts, according to the Congressional Budget Office. The deficit is down to $161 billion, 1.2% of GDP and half the average of the past half-century — thanks to tax cuts producing more than 8 million jobs in the past four years.

Rangel's plan is a nonstarter with George W. Bush in the White House. But in 2009, with a Democrat ensconced in the Oval Office, a nightmare like this could become law.

By INVESTOR'S BUSINESS DAILY | Posted Thursday, October 25, 2007 4:20 PM PT

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Oil $90 +++

Oil futures surpass $90 a barrel


By JOHN WILEN, AP Business Writer
Thu Oct 18, 7:00 PM ET

Oil prices surpassed $90 a barrel for the first time Thursday as the falling dollar drew new foreign investors and speculators to dollar-denominated energy futures.

Light, sweet crude for November delivery hit $90.02 in electronic trading Thursday evening before returning to around $89.60. Earlier, prices had risen $2.07 to settle at a record $89.47 on the New York Mercantile Exchange.


While oil prices have risen sharply in dollar terms in recent days, the steadily weakening dollar means oil futures are seen as a bargain overseas. Data released in recent weeks shows speculative buying of oil futures is on the rise. Buying by foreign investors sends prices up, which draws more speculators into the market.


"It becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy," said Brad Samples, commodities analyst at Summit Energy Services Inc. in Louisville, Ky.


Many analysts feel that the underlying fundamentals of supply and demand do not support oil prices of $90 a barrel. On Wednesday, the Energy Department reported that oil and gasoline supplies rose more than expected last week, countering suggestions that supplies are tight.

"Fundamental reasons, we're kind of running out of them," said James Cordier, president of Liberty Trading Group in Tampa, Fla. "The main driving factor today is ... the dollar making an all-time low against the euro," he said.


However, crude supplies at the closely watched Nymex delivery point of Cushing, Okla., fell last week. And several reports in recent days have predicted oil supplies will tighten in the fourth quarter.


Thursday was the fifth day in a row crude prices have set new records. Despite the gains, the price of oil is still below inflation-adjusted highs hit in early 1980. Depending on the adjustment, a $38 barrel of oil in 1980 would be worth $96 to $101 or more today.


November gasoline rose 3.85 cents to settle at $2.1851 a gallon, while Nymex heating oil futures rose 3.04 cents to settle at $2.3493 a gallon.


November natural gas futures fell 8.4 cents to settle at $7.374 per 1,000 cubic feet as investors shrugged off an Energy Department report that inventories rose by 39 billion cubic feet last week, less than analysts had expected. Supplies are high by historical standards.


In London, December Brent crude rose $1.47 to settle at $84.60 a barrel on the ICE Futures exchange.

At the pump, gas prices are finally beginning to follow oil futures higher. The national average price of a gallon of gas rose 1.9 cents overnight to $2.795, according to AAA and the Oil Price Information Service. Many analysts think prices will move even higher in coming days if oil prices don't retreat.


Some analysts think oil prices are nearing a seasonal peak and will soon begin to fall.

"It's hard to pick a top in a raging bull market, but it's possible that we are close," said Phil Flynn, an analyst at Alaron Trading Group in Chicago in a research note.

And if prices start to fall, they could fall quickly as speculators sell to lock in profits.

"We don't think industry fundamentals support oil prices near $60 (a barrel), let alone $90, but with excessive speculation and lack of government scrutiny, prices could go even higher, before they crash, eventually, in our view," said Fadel Gheit, an analyst at Oppenheimer & Co., in a research note.


 

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

IBD , "It could happen"

Nuclear Threat From Al-Qaida Much Too Real

By DAVID IGNATIUS | Posted Thursday, October 18, 2007 4:30 PM PT











Rolf Mowatt-Larssen is paid to think about the unthinkable. As the Energy Department's director of intelligence, he's responsible for gathering information about the threat that a terrorist group will attack America with a nuclear weapon.

With his shock of white hair and piercing eyes, Mowatt-Larssen looks like a man who has seen a ghost. And when you listen to a version of the briefing he has been giving recently to President Bush and other top officials, you begin to understand why. He is convinced that al-Qaida is trying to acquire a nuclear bomb that will leave the ultimate terrorist signature — a mushroom cloud.


We've all had enough fear-mongering to last a lifetime. Indeed, we have become so frightened of terrorism since Sept. 11, 2001, that we have begun doing the terrorists' job for them by undermining the legal framework of our democracy. And truly, I wish I could dismiss Mowatt-Larssen's analysis as the work of an overwrought former CIA officer with too many years in the trenches.


But it's worth listening to his warnings — not because they induce more numbing paralysis, but because they might stir sensible people to take actions that could detect and stop an attack. That's why his boss, Energy Secretary Samuel Bodman, is encouraging him to speak out. They don't want to anguish later that they didn't sound the alarm in time.

Mowatt-Larssen has been gathering this evidence since a few weeks after 9/11, when then-CIA director George Tenet asked him to create a new WMD branch in the agency's counterterrorism center. He helped Tenet prepare a chapter on al-Qaida's nuclear efforts that appears in his memoir, "At the Center of the Storm." Now that the uproar over Tenet's mistaken "slam dunk" assessment of the Iraqi threat has died down, it's worth rereading this account. It provides a chilling, public record of al-Qaida's nuclear ambitions.

Mowatt-Larssen argues that for nearly a decade before 9/11, al-Qaida was seeking to acquire weapons of mass destruction. As early as 1993, Osama bin Laden offered $1.5 million to buy uranium for a nuclear device, according to testimony presented in federal court in February 2001. When the al-Qaida leader was asked in 1998 if he had nuclear or chemical weapons, he responded:


"Acquiring weapons for the defense of Muslims is a religious duty. If I have indeed acquired these weapons, then I thank God for enabling me to do so."

Even as al-Qaida was preparing to fly its airplane bombs into buildings, the group also was trying to acquire nuclear and biological capability. In August 2001, bin Laden and his deputy, Ayman al-Zawahiri, met around a campfire with Pakistani scientists from a group called Umma Tameer-E-Nau to discuss how al-Qaida could build a nuclear device. Al-Qaida also had an aggressive anthrax program that was discovered in December 2001 after bin Laden was driven from his safe haven in Afghanistan.

Al-Qaida proclaimed a religious rationale to justify the WMD attacks it was planning.

In June 2002, a Kuwaiti-born cleric named Suleiman Abu Ghaith posted a statement on the Internet that "al-Qaida has the right to kill four million Americans" in retaliation for U.S. attacks against Muslims.


And in May 2003, at the same time Saudi operatives of al-Qaida were trying to buy three Russian nuclear bombs, a cleric named Nasir al-Fahd issued a fatwa titled, "A Treatise on the Legal Status of Using Weapons of Mass Destruction Against Infidels." Interrogations of al-Qaida operatives confirmed that the planning was serious.


Al-Qaida didn't yet have the materials for a WMD attack, but it wanted them.

Most chilling of all was Zawahiri's decision in March 2003 to cancel a cyanide attack in the New York subway system. He told the plotters to stand down because "we have something better in mind." What did that mean? More than four years later, we still don't know.


After 2004, the WMD trail went cold, according to Mowatt-Larssen. Many intelligence analysts have concluded that al-Qaida today doesn't have nuclear capability. Mowatt-Larssen argues that a more honest answer is: We don't know.


So what to do about this spectral danger? The first requirement, says Mowatt-Larssen, is to try to visualize it. What would it take for al-Qaida to build a bomb? How would it assemble the pieces? How would the U.S. and its allies deploy their intelligence assets so that they could detect a plot before it happened? How would we reinvent intelligence itself to avert this ultimate catastrophe?


A terrorist nuclear attack, as Tenet wrote in his book, would change history. If we can see how this story might end, perhaps we can deflect the arrow before it hits its target.

© 2007 Washington Post Writers Group

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Domestic Terrorist on HBO

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Gore Ideas Goofy, States Real Scientist

Gore gets a cold shoulder

Steve Lytte
October 14, 2007


Go to fullsize image



ONE of the world's foremost meteorologists has called the theory that helped Al Gore share the Nobel Peace Prize "ridiculous" and the product of "people who don't understand how the atmosphere works".

Dr William Gray, a pioneer in the science of seasonal hurricane forecasts, told a packed lecture hall at the University of North Carolina that humans were not responsible for the warming of the earth.


His comments came on the same day that the Nobel committee honoured Mr Gore for his work in support of the link between humans and global warming.

"We're brainwashing our children," said Dr Gray, 78, a long-time professor at Colorado State University. "They're going to the Gore movie [An Inconvenient Truth] and being fed all this. It's ridiculous."


At his first appearance since the award was announced in Oslo, Mr Gore said: "We have to quickly find a way to change the world's consciousness about exactly what we're facing."

Mr Gore shared the Nobel prize with the United Nations climate panel for their work in helping to galvanise international action against global warming.

But Dr Gray, whose annual forecasts of the number of tropical storms and hurricanes are widely publicised, said a natural cycle of ocean water temperatures - related to the amount of salt in ocean water - was responsible for the global warming that he acknowledges has taken place.

However, he said, that same cycle meant a period of cooling would begin soon and last for several years.


"We'll look back on all of this in 10 or 15 years and realise how foolish it was," Dr Gray said.

During his speech to a crowd of about 300 that included meteorology students and a host of professional meteorologists, Dr Gray also said those who had linked global warming to the increased number of hurricanes in recent years were in error.


He cited statistics showing there were 101 hurricanes from 1900 to 1949, in a period of cooler global temperatures, compared to 83 from 1957 to 2006 when the earth warmed.

"The human impact on the atmosphere is simply too small to have a major effect on global temperatures," Dr Gray said.


He said his beliefs had made him an outsider in popular science.

"It bothers me that my fellow scientists are not speaking out against something they know is wrong," he said. "But they also know that they'd never get any grants if they spoke out. I don't care about grants."


This story was found at: http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2007/10/13/1191696238792.html

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Nine Lies of Al Gore

Some Inconvenient Truths For Gore

By INVESTOR'S BUSINESS DAILY | Posted Thursday, October 11, 2007 4:20 PM PT

Junk Science: Al Gore's documentary on climate disaster has been ruled a work of fiction by a British judge. In legal terms, his global warming hysteria has been assuming facts not in evidence.


Go to fullsize image


Gore has long insisted that the debate over disastrous and imminent climate change induced by man-made global warming is over. A unanimous scientific "consensus" had formed, and the only doubters were "deniers" who also believe the moon landings were filmed on a movie lot in Arizona.

The British government apparently believed this, making Gore's "An Inconvenient Truth" part of the British secondary school curriculum. The greenies were happy, if for no other reason than convincing impressionable children and future voters is easier than defending their theories before award-winning pioneers in the field.

Stewart Dimmock, a school governor in Kent, said the government's decision amounted to brainwashing of children. Justice Michael Burton of the High Court in London, while agreeing warming is man-induced, also supported Dimmock's view that "(Gore's film) is not simply a science film . . . but that it is a political film."

Burton ruled that the film could be shown to British students, but only on the condition it be accompanied by new guidance notes for teachers to balance Gore's "one-sided" views. Burton documented nine major errors in Gore's film and wrote that some of Gore's claims had arisen "in the context of alarmism and exaggeration."

The first error Gore made, according to Burton, was in his apocalyptic vision of the devastation from a rise in sea levels caused by melting polar ice caps. Gore's claim of a 20-foot rise "in the near future" was dismissed as "distinctly alarmist." Burton wrote that such a rise could occur "only after, and over, millennia" and to suggest otherwise "is not in line with the scientific consensus."

As we have noted, the scientific consensus is that sea levels might rise anywhere from 7 inches to 23 inches, but it would take a century for that to occur. Even the latest IPCC report suggested that it would take a thousand years of higher-than-historic temperatures to melt the Greenland ice sheet, the basis of Gore's claim.

On Gore's claim that the loss of Mount Kilimanjaro's snows was due to climate change, the judge said the scientific community had been unable to find evidence of a direct link. In fact, it found the opposite.

In 2002, glaciologist Lonnie Thompson reported that from 1953 to 1976, a period of global cooling that had some predicting a new ice age, a full 21% of Kilimanjaro's main glacier disappeared. It was caused not by man-induced warming, but by deforestation.

Burton said Gore's suggestion that the Gulf Stream that warms the North Atlantic would shut down also was contradicted by the IPCC's assessment that it was "very unlikely" to happen.

Burton also ridiculed Gore's claim that polar bears were drowning while searching for ice melted by global warming. The only drowned polar bears the court said it was aware of were four bears that died following a storm.

There is no word from Gore on whether he thinks Judge Burton was paid off by Big Oil, drives an SUV or thinks the moon landing was fake. For Gore, it's an inconvenient truth that in its first court case, the Industrial Revolution was put on trial and found not guilty on at least nine counts.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

LOST in Space , Chicken of the Sea

Big Sea Treaty Would Crush Entrepreneurs





Go to fullsize image

by DOUG BANDOW | Posted Tuesday, October 09, 2007 4:30 PM PT

The Law of the Sea Treaty, or LOST, is the most important treaty you've never heard of. It would turn over all of the world's unclaimed natural resources to a second United Nations and is moving ever so steadily toward Senate ratification.

Back in the 1970s, some Third World governments loudly campaigned for a global socialist economic order of more foreign aid, U.N. regulation of business and collectivist resource development. LOST is a result.


It declared all seabed resources to be the "common heritage of mankind," levied fees and royalties on Western mining and oil companies, created a monopoly company to mine the seabed, and established a new international body to divvy up the spoils.

President Ronald Reagan refused to sign the treaty in 1982, leaving it to sink beneath the waves. But President Bill Clinton decided to "fix" LOST. After winning a few small concessions, the U.S. signed.


For years, opposition in the GOP-controlled Senate prevented American ratification, but more than enough other countries assented to bring LOST into effect. President Bush now supports the accord. Yet the treaty retains its collectivist framework.

In broad sweep, LOST covers three subject areas. The first includes exclusive economic zones, fishing, marine research, ocean pollution and oil exploration. The second covers navigational freedom. The third covers seabed mining — and it is here where the treaty's worst parts lie.

LOST establishes the International Seabed Authority — governed by a Council, Assembly, and various committees and commissions — to regulate the oceans. It also establishes an agency called the Enterprise that would both mine the seabed and collect fees from its own competitors, Western mining companies.


And mining won't be the only industry affected. Energy companies, for instance, will owe the ISA royalties on any oil produced from the Outer Continental Shelf beyond 200 miles.

Those may be the first global taxes imposed on Americans without congressional approval. And for what? To be handed out to corrupt Third World governments and whomever else the majority decides to shower with benefits.


Moreover, those same Third World governments could well hope to use LOST for their own ends. William C.G. Burns of the Monterey Institute of International Studies, a LOST advocate, calls the treaty "a promising instrument through which such [LEGAL]action might be taken, given its broad definition of pollution to the marine environment and the dispute resolution mechanisms contained within its provision." That's a recipe for a flood of international lawsuits that could undermine U.S. prosperity and sovereignty.


Russia's recent submarine North Pole flag-planting expedition has led treaty advocates to suggest that the U.S. can't dispute Moscow's territorial claims while remaining outside the treaty. But America need not be a member to protect its interests.

For example, a body set up under LOST, the U.N. Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf, rejected Russian Arctic territorial claims in 2002 based in part on information supplied by the U.S.


LOST's affirmation of navigational freedom has won widespread support, including from the U.S. Navy. Yet it would bring no net benefit; most of the transit provisions incorporate existing customary international law. Moreover, those provisions are ambiguous on certain matters — including an undefined exemption of "military" transit activities.

The Bush administration proposes various "understandings" restricting the treaty's reach, but there is no guarantee that the treaty's arbitration mechanisms will uphold U.S. positions. Treaty supporters acknowledge the original accord was flawed, and now claim that LOST has been "fixed." But the Clinton administration merely made a horrible treaty slightly less horrid.

The governing philosophy, regulatory structure and most of the rules remain the same. Where explicit redistributionist provisions, such as technology transfer mandates, were dropped, other, more ambiguous, language was left in place that could have the same effect.

Such a Byzantine regulatory structure is likely to discourage entrepreneurship in fields that could be affected — especially the development of technology, software, and other products with multiple ocean uses.


Further, applying a similar approach to other technological frontiers, such as outer space and cyberspace, would discourage private innovation in those fields. In fact, treaty proponents emphasize LOST's value as a legal precedent.


LOST is not without benefits, but most of those already can be enjoyed without ratifying the treaty. Unfortunately, the costs of joining are too high. Enshrining collectivism as international law to be enforced by a mini-me United Nations would be as foolish as it would be costly.

Bandow is the Bastiat Scholar at the Competitive Enterprise Institute.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Harry Potter Hired as a Campaign Consultant

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Oil $18,000 a Barrel in Todays Dollars

 

"The First Oilwell in the United States of America" and How $80 Seems Cheap
By Robert Gaston

Dateline... Titusville, Pennsylvania; the year is 1854.


Oil was selling at $40.00 a barrel, (that's $18,000 at todays prices!) .

At that time there were no oilwells. Oil was skimmed from springs, off ponds, and creeks where it collected. Oil had only a few uses; axle grease for wagons, adhesive, caulk for boats, illuminating lamp fuel (kerosene), and some medicinal use.


Dr. F. B. Brewer, a Titusville physician, visiting his professor of surgery at Dartmouth College, had showed him, as a curiosity, a sample of oil skimmed from a spring on land belonging to his family. The professor in turn showed the sample to another Dartmouth graduate, George Bissell, a New York lawyer. In an amazing excercise of productive creativity, lawyer Bissell wondered if the oil could be used for lamp fuel in place of the standard and cheapest illuminant, whale oil, the supply of which was getting no longer adequate. Benjamin Silliman, a Yale University chemistry and geology professor analyzed Bissell?s sample and declared it could be refined into excellent kerosene.


Bissell immediately leased the land on Oil Creek containing the spring, thus becoming the first Petroleum Landman, and interested some New Haven bankers in backing a company that would try to develop oil in quantity, thus becoming the first Oil and Gas Promoter. This company, Pennsylvania Rock Oil Company, was the first oil company in the USA.

Bissell, being the creative sort, happened upon a picture on a patent medicine circular, illustrating a wooden tower housing machinery used to drill salt wells. Samuel Kier, a Pittsburgh salt-works owner, had found a profitable use for the nuisance rock-oil that came up with the brine by bottling and selling it as " Kier?s Petroleum or Rock Oil Celebrated for its Wonderful Curative Powers. A Natural Remedy Procured from a Well in Allegheny County, Pennsylvania, 400 feet below the Earth?s Surface". This competed, although probably less favorably, with the cocaine and alcohol and laudenum based "curatives" on the market at the time. Now who would you consider to be a better salesman? The guy who sells people powerful narcotics in order to feel better or someone who talks people into drinking petroleum?


If oil could be found indirectly as a result of drilling for salt, Bissell wondered, why not use the same method to find oil directly? It did not occur to the Pennsylvania Rock Oil Company promoters that any special talent would be required to drill such a well, otherwise they would probably not have selected so unlikely a manager as Edwin L. Drake, a railroad conductor.

Mr. Drake, was commissioned by Pennsylvania Rock Oil Company as a "Colonel", with the thought that it would lend dignity to the project. This was the first time that fraud was used to secure investment in the oil patch.


Drake immediately hired William A. "Uncle Billy" Smith, a sprightly old blacksmith, knowledgeable about salt wells and salt works, who set about building a 35 foot high wooden derrick and equipment housing. The Drawworks were homemade and the rig was powered by a small 6 or 8 horsepower steam engine, and a tubular marine boiler called a "Long John". This was the first dedicated oilrig.


Uncle Billy became the first toolpusher. He worked for Drake about three years and then retired. He took with him the first string of tools from the Drake well and preserved them for us to see today and are on exhibit at a museum on the site of the well. The tool string consists of the rope socket and sinker bar, jars and temper screw, the reamer, some bits and a couple of sand pumps (bailers).


Uncle Billy and his two sons kept the well drilling while "Colonel" Drake supervised and fished (for real fish) and played Euchre with the storeowners in Titusville, thus becoming the first "company man".

People in Titusville referred to the operation as a foolish venture, a "folley?, or "Drake?s Folley", after all, who had ever heard of drilling into the ground for oil?

Soon problems arose, water coming into the hole caused the crew to spend more time bailing out water than drilling. One year had gone by and the well had only been drilled to 40 feet and had cost $2,490.00, (thus leading, I suppose, to the the first day rate contract!). The New Haven backers, unable to sell more stock refused to send Drake another dollar, although he assured them he had finally solved the drilling difficulties.

The assets were then leased to the Senneca Oil Company of New Haven, which, until then had been bottling Oil for "medicinal" purposes.


Drake continued as drilling supervisor.

Drake lined the well with pipe to a point below the water entry, thus shutting off the flow of water and continued to drill through the pipe. Drake was no longer an imposter! He had earned a real title?that of inventor?and this ingenious idea would be adopted by all drillers after him. This was the first use of casing in an oilwell.


On Saturday afternoon August 26, 1859, Uncle Billy reported to Drake that the well had been drilled to a depth of 69 ½ feet.


The drilling was shutdown on Sundays and on this particular Sunday, while Uncle Billy was tidying-up around the rig, he happened to look down the hole. He noted with irritation that water had seeped into the hole and was up within 10 feet of the top. He sent the bailer down to start bailing it out, but when the bailer was pulled from the hole it was dripping with oil.

Uncle Billy hurried to town and slyly did not tell Drake why he wanted him to come to the wellsite.


"Look there!" Uncle Billy said. "What do you think of this?"


The mystified Drake looked down the hole. "What?s that?" he asked (remember... the first "company man").


"That?s your fortune," Uncle Billy said gleefully.


The crew set about to complete the well to produce the oil that had been found. Two inch copper tubing was run into the well and since the flow was small, Drake and Uncle Billy rigged up a pump. This increased the production to 35 barrels of oil a day. With oil selling for $40.00 a barrel this started a flurry of activity. Speculators rushed to drill wells up and down the creek, thus the first cornershooters.


Wells were drilled, some using the simplest equipment, and found oil that gushed as much as 1000 barrels per day.


Soon the countryside was pockmarked with wells and in two years time this forest of wooden derricks had sucked so much oil from under the Pennsylvania landscape that the price was down to 10 cents a barrel, given that there really wasn't a market for thousands, much less millions of barrels of oil at that time. The new oil industry nearly died before it started. However the glut was not to continue, as Americans and Europeans were finding more and more new uses for this plentiful product.


With America?s emergence from the War Between the States, the demand for petroleum products increased and the country was headed for economic boom times.

www.bigoilfields.com

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Physic and the Oilman

The Physic and the Oilman 
by Robert L. Gaston


The discovery of oil in the Edwards formation of south-central Texas in the year '22 was the starting gun for a brand new trend of exploration and development. Credited with this trend is Edgar Byram Davis (1873 - 1951), who pioneered the Edwards, and to the many other prospectors who carried Edwards exploration from the Sabine to the Rio Grande. Later gas discoveries in the Edwards established substantial reserves and additional exploration opportunities until today.

The discovery of oil in the Edwards formation opened a chapter in the history of the oil business, which was as important to Central Texas as were the great discoveries at Spindletop for the Gulf Coast, Yates for West Texas, C. M. "Dad" Joiner's No. 3 Daisy Bradford well for East Texas. As in all the above cases, oil and gas discoveries in this province shot local lifestyles upward, from hard-scrabble farming in the country and subsistence living in local towns to more comfortable and professional lifestyles, that even broached, in some cases, luxury.

After the initial excesses of the boom days had subsided, cultural improvements and progress characterized local community life, and both the countryside and urban centers have continued to enjoy the benefits first introduced to the area by Mother Oil. As was the case throughout the oil patch, hundreds of ranchers were able to keep their land in the family and prosper through the risk-taking and efforts of these great wildcatting pioneers and their modern brethren, rather than suffer seeing their hard-earned assets disappear through foreclosure into the maws of banks and financiers during and after the Great Depression. The economic impact cannot be underestimated throughout the main productive trend, extending from Caldwell to Webb County, a distance of 165 miles and will continue way into the future, so long as politicos and other assorted rascals leave well enough alone.

The story of oils discovery in the Edwards, like all oil and gas plays, is laced with doubt, disappointment, dogged persistence, and fabulous success. It had its inception in the mind of a man guided by a firm "FAITH", as he would always insist it be spelled. Although this interesting man passed to his heavenly reward in October 1951, he attained the status of a legend. Even while living, his retiring attitude and deeply religious nature caused most to regard him as a man of mystery. This remarkable individual who first discovered oil in the Edwards was Edgar B. Davis, late "Citizen of Luling".

The saga of Edgar B. Davis should live because it stands out as a unique story in the annals of the oil industry. Unlike the typical oilpatch stories that commonly abound of swashbuckling promoters discovering oil by sheer luck, of "poorboy" wildcatters spending their last dollar to bring in an elusive gusher, Edgar B. Davis stands out as a contrast to the common rough and ready lot of the typical oilpatch. Davis was a member of an old New England family, reared with all the luxuries of the prosperous gay nineties. He had traveled the world, associated with royalty, played golf, excelled at bridge, loved music and art. Admitting to no church affiliation, he nevertheless considered himself "Steward of the Lord," ordained to improve the lot of his fellow man.

This extraordinary individual left a promising business career at 35 years of age as co-founder and sales executive of the Walkover Shoe Company of Brockton, Massachusetts, in an effort to improve his poor health on a world tour. In Singapore, he met a Dutch rubber plantation manager who induced him to interest the United States Rubber Company in cultivating rubber trees in Sumatra.

This proved to be a highly successful venture for Davis and resulted in his acquiring $4,000,000.00 in rubber company stocks and cash, a huge fortune in those days. Upon his return to New York he declined an attractive offer to become president of the United States Rubber Company, because he felt the job would confine his activities too much. Instead, he betook it upon himself, at the age of 50, to transplant himself from his luxurious New York lifestyle to the impoverished farming community of Luling, Texas. Without Eva Gabor. His immediate mission in doing so was to salvage whatever could be retrieved from a $75,000 investment in a shaky wildcat venture made by his elder brother and some associates. The record is hazy if the promoter was named Haney. Little did he realize where his decision to leave "the City" would lead.

A true entrepreneur, fascinated by the idea of prospecting for oil, and imbued with the impassioned desire to bring prosperity to the inhabitants of his newly adopted home community, he acquired the interests of his brother and associates and dedicated himself wholly to his newfound task of salvaging his wildcatting interests.

The first step led him to assume the lease obligations of the Texas Southern Oil and Lease Syndicate in the Luling area. This syndicate had assembled leases covering most of what are now the Salt Flat and Darst Creek fields as well as about 85 percent of the Luling field. Many of these leases had to be dropped for lack of finances, but the Luling block was retained on the basis of a fault exposed in the San Marcos River and the mapping of an inlier of lower Wilcox against it. The discovery of the fault is credited to Vernon E. Woolsey; and additional work by him, Carol E. Cook, Roy A. Dobbins and others resulted in definition of the lower Wilcox inlier on this up-to-the-coast fault. The Syndicate drilled its first well in 1920 on the Thompson lease in the George C. Kimball survey, Caldwell County. It was abandoned as a dry hole in the Buda Limestone, 150 feet above the Edwards, but shows of oil and gas in the Eagleford provided encouragement for additional drilling.

Davis named his new enterprise, organized March 18, 1921, the "United North and South Oil Company, Inc.", as a Yankee gesture of friendship toward the unrepentant parochial planters of this Southern community. After taking over the holdings of Texas Southern Oil and Lease Syndicate, he spudded a well on the Cartwright farm, about a quarter mile closer to the surface fault trace than the Syndicate's Thompson dry hole. It had a small show of oil in the Edwards, as did the No. 2 Cartwright drilled about 500 feet up dip, although both were plugged as dry holes. On May 5, 1921 the No. 3 Cartwright was spudded and was plugged as a dry hole on June 16. The Cartwright No. 4 soon followed at a nearby location and was also dry. Adding to the injury, the No. 2 Thompson proved to be a failure as well.

At this point, a desperate Davis sought out the great clairvoyant Edgar Cayce. In a trance, Cayce described the underground geological structure in detail for Davis. The resulting discovery, made on the basis of Cayce's revelation, also flew in the face of accepted geological wisdom of the time. As Humble's (now Exxon-Mobil) chief geologist, Wallace E. Pratt, a skeptic when it came to looking for oil around faults, put it,

"the hazards of exploration in faulted territory are already widely appreciated."

But, then, Pratt had not consulted Edgar Cayce!

On the basis of Cayce's advice, Davis made a seventh location on the Rafael Rios 126 acre farm in the John Henry survey. The well was spudded June 19, 1922 and, on the hot afternoon of August 9, 1922, a depressed if not totally discouraged group of three United North and South people, Edgar Davis, Agnes Manford and W. F. Peale, sat watching the hypnotic rotary grinding away at 2,100 feet. Just as Peale, at the wheel of their car, was about to drive away, Miss Manford is reported to have pointed and shouted (in a most undignified way): "Look, Boys, Look!"

A black column was rising from Rafael Rios No. 1; the crew was scattering. The column was rising higher, higher, like an aroused giant black snake. Miss Manford and Peale quickly piled out of the car as the black column rose higher, rising above the crown block and began to spray the black, greasy stuff of which dreams were made (and of which environmental lawsuits are made today).

Peale and Miss Manford were a bit hysterical. For the charming bachelor who had furnished so many pleasant evenings at cards or talk; for the employer of Peale who had never looked back, never faltered, never lost his beatific smile; for the strange man who seemed half of the present material world and half of the heavenly world to come, they were overjoyed.

And Davis himself? That gentle smile grew a bit more expansive perhaps; he was quieter, if anything, and he retained that ever-present dignity. Yes, the foreordained had come to pass, the Lord, through the instrument of Edgar B. Davis, had achieved another objective, and in the end Davis, drenched with oil, reminded his employees that he must go to town.

To Luling went the oil-spattered trio and when the giant Davis was asked if he wanted to go to the hotel to change clothes.

He said, "No, first to Mackey's Drug Store."

At Mackey's, they called for J. R. Mackey, who had been sure Davis was chasing a "will-o'-the-wisp" and had said so publicly many times. Mackey came out, stared, threw up his hand and said with awe,

"The drinks are on me. Anything you want. Anything!"

Thus the story of Luling is, in a way, the story of Edgar B. Davis, who would walk into a fiery furnace if his Lord ordered, yet belonged to no church, who is Luling's godfather, but who, at age 77 had never married; the Yankee who had walked with princes and kings, but who spent his happiest years among the descendants of Rebels who loved him.

On August 10, 1922, the Luling boom began, gaining momentum slowly at first, because oilmen were skeptical of Edwards production. Magnolia Petroleum Company (later Mobil and today Exxon-Mobil) came forward with an offer to buy 1,000,000 barrels of oil in the ground at 50 cents a barrel. Davis and his associates accepted quickly and used the $500,000 to finance early development of the Luling field. Extension of the discovery area 1.6 miles northeast was established on March 13, 1923, by the Caldwell Oil Company No. 1 Hardeman, which made gas. In May 1923, Royal Oil Company completed a well for over 1000 barrels a day on their 40 acre W. H. Tabor lease, later acquired by Grayburg Oil Company. This extended the field 2 ½ miles northeast of the Rios No. 1 discovery well. The rate of drilling increased after these extensions, and many wells were completed with initial production of 1000 barrels a day or more.

By December 1924, the field had 391 producing wells, and by the end of 1926, the total number of wells had increased to 502.

In the spring of 1926, display advertisements appeared on the financial pages of several well-known newspapers stating that the Luling Field properties of the United North and South Oil Company were for sale. It is reported that several major oil companies considered the deal and made offers, but probably because the production was from limestone, and the fact that many of the fabulous Mexican fields of the same type were suddenly beginning to make salt water, no trade was immediately consummated. The Magnolia Petroleum Company, having bought the first production from the field and with pipeline facilities in place, eventually met the advertised price of $12,100,000. The deal was consummated on June 11, 1926, on a basis of half cash and half in oil as produced.

That should have been the end of the saga of Edgar B. Davis. The man, at age 56, had more money than any man would ever need. But the strange New Englander recognized something that not many men do, an obligation to those who help them make fortunes. And the benevolent, unusual visionary went about it in a most unusual way. First he announced a barbecue to which Luling, Caldwell County, Guadalupe County, former employees, friends over the world and well…. practically everyone… were invited. He bought a herd of beeves, all the soft drinks in central Texas, imported entertainers from New York and purchased and cleared 100 acres of land white with cotton at harvest time for the jubilee.

"Come one, come all", advertised Davis. And pretty near everyone did, or so it seemed.

The most conservative estimates placed the crowd at 15,000 while others looking at the sea of faces, swore not less than 40,000 were there. And the 15,000 or 40,000 were not only fed but also electrified with excitement.

Every employee drew a bonus. Those who had been with him one year drew 25 percent of total salaries paid them to date; two years brought 50 percent; and four years, 100 percent. Five men on his firm's management committee received checks for $200,000 each.

A couple of million was the conservative cost to Luling's benefactor for bonuses alone. But there was more to come: A $50,000 golf course later built on that $150,000 cleared cotton patch, a $50,000 black athletic clubhouse, a $150,000 total endowment for upkeep of both.

Something bigger was on the mind of the town's benefactor who later put into writing approximately what he said that day and which reveals the magnificent obsession of the man.

"Believing that the kind and generous Providence, who guides the destinies of all humanity, directed me in the search for oil…" he wrote, and believing that the wealth which has resulted has not come through any virtue or ability of mine, but has been given to me in trust; and desiring to discharge in some measure the trust which has reposed in me; and in consideration of the opportunity which the resources of Texas gave me; and of my interest in the welfare of the citizens of the City of Luling, Caldwell, Guadalupe and Gonzales Counties;… and realizing the evils of the one-crop system ; and the hope through experimental work in diversified crops of aiding the tillers of the land to secure a larger return for their labor…" With such a promise the man who had something of the ethereal in him proceeded to establish the Luling Foundation for the benefit of agriculture with $1,000,000.

Much has been written about Edgar B. Davis and far more could be written if the man of mystery had left written records or if he had communicated more freely with his associates.

One regrets to reveal that Fate proved cruel in the end by removing the great man from the scene, on October 10 1951, before the United North and South Development Company was able to realize the second vast fortune Edgar B. Davis had dreamed about. His complete saga when it is written will reveal a depth of "FAITH" totally undeterred by difficulty.

*"FAITH"
The use of "FAITH" is in deference to Edgar B. Davis who always capitalized the word in his writing.


Addendum:

In writing the story of Edgar B Davis, the old Wanderer unwittingly perpetuated two myths that now need to be corrected. Some of us write without letting the facts stand in the way of a good story.

The first concerns Davis consulting the great clairvoyant Edgar Cayce.

From Riley Froh’s book “Edgar B. Davis: Wildcatter Extraordinary”, is this about Cayce:

Some time in 1921 a singular oil exploration crew arrived in Luling composed of a young businessman, David Kahn and his “clairvoyant” friend

Edgar Cayce. To locate oil, Cayce went into a trance; spoke in detail of the underground oil structure, while Khan took notes. In this manner they supposedly located first Luling and then the Oil reservoir. With three thousand acres under lease, the pair entered upon frustrating drilling operations that depleted their funds.

David Khan met Davis shortly thereafter in Fort Worth or New York, where Khan related his psychic information to Davis.

That Davis put much stock in such chance conversations is doubtful, but he was interested in psychic phenomena. In 1929 he was attempting to get in touch with Cayce, and he did meet the clairvoyant in the thirties and had several interpretations of his life related while the seer was in a trance.

The second concerns The Rios No. 1 discovery well, blowing out and spraying Davis and his group with oil. This happened not at the Rios well but at Merriweather No. 2, where oil blew out over the top of the derrick and sprayed Davis’ group and their car.

Now it seems the story is more truthful although less sensational.

Editors Note:

I watched my father chase the Cayce Myths in San Saba ,County spending over 3 million dollars in the early 70's to drill wells through granite searching for the elusive Rocky Creek field where Cayce believed the "Mothers of All Fields" was located. To date no commercial production has been found in San Saba.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Hollywood Actors Make Forturnes in Oil Business

From Time Magazine in 1949






In Hollywood, an oilman quipped: "When you see a group of movie people talking on the set, you don't know whether they're discussing an oil well or a movie."

Oil was on Hollywood's mind. Moviedom's tax-bitten stars thought they had found a sure—or almost sure—way out of their troubles in the high tax brackets. If they struck oil, they could deduct 50% to 75% of the drilling expenses from their income, and later deduct 27½% of their annual gross from the well, as "depletion." Moreover, they could sell the well later and pay only a long-term capital gains (25%) tax on the profit. If the well was dry, they could write off the whole cost as a loss, thus cut down taxable income. Though many a hopeful had hit nothing but sand and salt, from Texas to Utah last week a handful of luckier stars had struck it rich.

Black Gold. Near Wichita Falls, Tex., Gene Autry's sixth well, begun a fortnight ago, had come in handsomely. The drillers had struck oil at 5,000 ft. The well gushed 1,200 barrels the first day, settled down to a tidy daily flow of 1,000 barrels. (Autry owns equal shares in the claim with two Texas wildcatters.) Last week drillers started a seventh well, planned to drill some 20 more on Autry's property.

Jimmy Stewart reported a steady 800 barrels a day from his No. i well, brought in at 4,180 ft. near Vernal, Utah, last fortnight. Stewart and his partners (among them: Continental Airlines' President Robert Six; Howard Hughes's ubiquitous agent, Johnny Meyer; and General Aniline & Film's Chairman Jack Frye) had risked $75,000 on a tip Meyer got from a geologist who had previously tipped Meyer and Frank Sinatra to another payoff site (Sinatra's "Crooner No. i" well in Wyoming).

Star Dust. In Texas' Scurry County, on a 1,700-acre tract leased by Bob Hope and Bing Crosby, drillers brought in a 1,000-barrel well, their second in two months. Hope and Crosby and their two Texas partners promptly began drilling two more. Near by, Don Ameche, who had leased 21,600 acres with three Chicago partners, had put up $200,000 to sink a wildcat. Just east of the small town of Rotan, Tex., where he had leased 1,500 acres, Randolph Scott and his partner found oil sands at 5,700 ft., hoped to be producing "within three weeks."


Not all of Hollywood's wildcatters had been so lucky. Directors John Huston and Mervyn Le Roy, and Actor Dennis O'Keefe and several oilmen recently sank $194,000 into a 10,500-ft. dry well near Inglewood, Calif. Even those who had made strikes would not necessarily turn them into profits; they still had the problem of operating the well and marketing the oil. As one California oilman put it: "I can give you an oil well which is actually producing a good amount of oil, and bet you'll go broke if you don't know what you're doing. The stars . . . don't know enough about the business . . ."
From Time Magazine in 1949

www.bigoilfields.com

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive